Trust issues

Joel Dean
Joel Dean, Founder of Joyful

"Trust issues" is everyday language, and it's not a diagnosis. It usually means finding it hard to believe a partner will be honest, reliable and caring, even when nothing they've done points the other way. Distrust with a reason is something else. If a partner lied, cheated or watches your every move, doubting them is a response to what happened, not an issue inside you.

A trust issue or a real reason?

The phrase gets thrown at people who have every reason to be wary, and that can make them doubt themselves twice. Ask one question: is the doubt about something that happened, or about something you fear might happen?

  • Running ahead of the facts: She's late again. She's probably with someone else.
  • Responding to something real: She said she'd stopped messaging him, and I saw the messages last night.

Both feel the same in the body.

The next steps differ: the first is worth checking against the facts, on paper, and the second is worth a direct conversation, and sometimes a decision.

If your partner checks your phone, tracks where you are or cuts you off from people, and calls it your "trust issues" when you object, that's a different problem. The red flags page covers it, and the National Domestic Violence Hotline is open 24 hours at 1-800-799-7233 or by texting START to 88788.1

Predictability, dependability, faith

In 1985, the psychologists John Rempel, John Holmes and Mark Zanna measured trust between partners as three distinct parts.2 "I have trust issues" is hard to work with. "I can't predict him" is something you can talk about. The examples are written for this page and aren't real people's words.

Predictability

Whether a partner's behavior is consistent from one day to the next, judged from experience.3 Of the three it's the most concrete, built up from many small, ordinary days: the call when they said they'd call, dinner at the time they said, the same mood at the door on Friday as on Monday.

"I never know which version of him is coming home tonight."

Dependability

Whether a partner has the qualities, such as honesty and reliability, that make it reasonable to rely on them even when you could get hurt.3

"If I tell her something private, will it end up in the group chat?"

Faith

Confidence that a partner will keep caring and stay responsive when the future is uncertain.3 It can vanish while the other two look fine.

"Things are good right now. I just can't believe it'll last."

Rereading a short reply for what it hides

The habit tends to show up before the thought does. A few versions:

  • You reread their messages for a hidden meaning in a short reply.
  • A delay of an hour feels like evidence.
  • You ask the same question again, hoping for the answer that finally settles it.
  • You keep a little distance, so it won't hurt as much if they let you down.
  • When they're kind, part of you waits for the catch.

The fourth is easy to miss. Pulling back can feel like self-protection, and it can also leave a partner with less to be trusted with.

Why doubt makes people hold back

Across a set of studies by Mario Mikulincer, securely attached adults reported more trust in their partners than insecurely attached adults did, recalled good trust memories more readily, and coped with a broken trust more constructively.4 People with an anxious style wanted security from trust as well, and people with an avoidant style wanted control.4 The anxious attachment and avoidant attachment pages go further.

Sandra Murray, John Holmes and Nancy Collins describe a "risk regulation" system: confidence that a partner values and cares for you is what lets you risk depending on them.5 When that confidence is low, holding back feels like the safer move.

The moments that build it

Ninety-two married or cohabiting couples each asked their partner for something that would need a real sacrifice.6 Partners high in trust were more accommodating when asked, and more open and collaborative when they were the ones asking.6 Those costly requests tend to be where trust gets tested, and built.

Better at measuring than at fixing

Jeffry Simpson, a leading trust researcher, wrote in 2007 that limited research had examined how trust develops, holds and unravels.7 Any "5 steps to fix trust issues" list, the one below included, is practical advice that hasn't been proven.

Ask instead of checking

  1. Name the part. Is it predictability, dependability or faith? Write one sentence for the one that feels weakest, such as "I can't count on her to do what she says."
  2. Separate the event from the story. "He didn't reply for three hours" is the event. "He's hiding something" is the story. Write them on separate lines and check the second in the thought record.
  3. Ask before you look. Before you check their phone or their location, write down what you're afraid of. Then ask about it in one sentence, as a feeling: "I got anxious when I didn't hear from you. Can we talk about it?"
  4. Keep a record of the other side. For two weeks, note each time your partner did what they said, or chose you when it cost them something, the kind of moment the couples study points to.6 Fear keeps a careful list. Give it something to weigh against.
  5. After a betrayal, it takes both of you. Trying harder to believe won't rebuild trust after a lie or an affair on its own. It needs the other person's honesty over time, and often a couples therapist.

When the doubt follows you from one relationship to the next

If the doubt takes up hours of your day, or follows you from one relationship to the next, a therapist trained in cognitive behavioral therapy can help you work on the thoughts and checking habits described above. A couples therapist can help when there's been a betrayal.

If a partner is the one checking, tracking or restricting you, see a therapist alone, not together, and talk to an advocate first.

Joyful is an AI journaling companion, not therapy or a crisis service.

Write the doubt exactly as it sounds in your head. Then write one thing your partner has done that supports it, and one thing they've done that doesn't. Leave both on the page.

Answer this with Joy

Questions people ask

How do you fix trust issues?

Nobody has a proven fix, and research on how trust is rebuilt is limited.7 What you can do is narrower and more useful: work on the one part that's shaky, and notice the days your partner shows up.

What are common trust issues?

Doubting a partner's honesty, expecting to be left, and reading meaning into small delays. In Rempel's terms, those map onto worries about dependability, faith and predictability, in that order.3

What are signs that a relationship lacks trust?

Checking phones, repeated questions that never feel answered, secrets kept about harmless things, and holding back to stay safe. One partner monitoring or restricting the other goes past low trust into control.1

Are trust issues linked to attachment style?

Yes, in the research. Securely attached adults report more trust in their partners than insecurely attached adults.4 The attachment styles page explains what those styles are, and whether they change.

Sources

  1. National Domestic Violence Hotline. Domestic abuse warning signs. Read October 30, 2026. https://www.thehotline.org/identify-abuse/domestic-abuse-warning-signs/
  2. Rempel JK, Holmes JG, Zanna MP. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985;49(1):95-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
  3. PsyToolkit. Trust in close relationships scale (Rempel, Holmes and Zanna, 1985), description of the three subscales. Read October 30, 2026. https://www.psytoolkit.org/survey-library/trust.html
  4. Mikulincer M. Attachment working models and the sense of trust: an exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998;74(5):1209-1224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
  5. Murray SL, Holmes JG, Collins NL. Optimizing assurance: the risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 2006;132(5):641-666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
  6. Shallcross SL, Simpson JA. Trust and responsiveness in strain-test situations: a dyadic perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012;102(5):1031-1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026829
  7. Simpson JA. Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2007;16(5):264-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00517.x