All-or-nothing thinking

Joel Dean
Joel Dean, Founder of Joyful

All-or-nothing thinking sorts things into two boxes, such as success or failure, good or bad, with nothing in between. One flaw is enough to tip the whole thing into the bad box. Most of life happens in the middle, and the middle is exactly what this pattern hides.

  • Also called: Black-and-white thinking, dichotomous thinking, or polarized thinking.
  • Listen for: "always", "never", "completely", "ruined", "perfect", "total failure".
  • Close relative: Should statements, which set the line that decides which box you land in.
  • One question to ask: Where on a scale from 0 to 100 does this sit?

It's 4 p.m., you've eaten a cookie you didn't plan on, and by 4:05 the day is "ruined", so dinner might as well be takeout and the plan can restart Monday.

That's the pattern in one afternoon. The cookie was a small thing. The verdict wasn't.

David Burns put it first on his list of 10 cognitive distortions and tied it to perfectionism: a result that isn't perfect counts as a failure.1 It works on people too. A friend is wonderful until one late reply, and then they don't care at all.

More of the same shape

Made up for this page, from training plans, homes and holidays:

"I missed my run on Thursday, so this week of training is a write-off."

"We had a fight about the dishes. Maybe this relationship just doesn't work."

"If I can't host the holiday the way Mom did, there's no point hosting at all."

"Either I finish the whole house today or I'm a lazy mess."

"I stumbled on one question at the end. The whole interview was a disaster."

Watch what comes after. The thought often ends in "then why bother?", and the half that went fine gets thrown out along with the rest.

Projects that stay at zero

The pattern doesn't only judge what's done. It stops things from starting. If the only two results are perfect or pointless, a project that can't be done properly today stays at 0, because 100 looks too far away.

The garage stays full, the application stays unopened, and the day feels "ruined" by ten in the morning. Praise slides off when one part wasn't right.

What the forum words showed

The pattern leaves marks in language. Mohammed Al-Mosaiwi and Tom Johnstone analyzed posts from more than 6,400 members of 63 online forums, and the forums about anxiety and depression used far more absolutist words, such as "always", "nothing" and "completely", than control forums did.2

Forums for people recovering from depression had more of them too. The authors suggest absolutist thinking may be a vulnerability that outlasts the low mood, more than a passing symptom of it.2 That was a study of language across forums, so it can't say anything about any one person.

It's also been measured head on. Sarah Egan and colleagues compared a clinical group, athletes and students, and dichotomous thinking was the strongest predictor of the unhelpful kind of perfectionism in their study.3 It predicted that kind more strongly than the healthy pursuit of high standards.3 When the bar is "perfect", every other result lands in the failure box.

The 0 to 100 line

The fix the pattern hates most is a ruler. Here are the same events, sorted two ways:

  • Two boxes: I ate one cookie, so the whole diet is ruined.
  • On a scale: One cookie at 4 p.m. Breakfast, lunch and dinner went the way I planned.
  • Two boxes: I lost my temper with the kids, so I'm failing as a parent.
  • On a scale: One bad evening in a long week of school runs, dinners and bedtimes.

To draw your own:

  1. Find the absolute word. Circle "always", "never", "ruined" or "completely" in what you wrote. That word is where the middle went missing.
  2. Draw a line and place the event on it. Mark 0 and 100 at each end and put a dot where today sits. Christine Padesky lists continuum methods like this among the ways cognitive therapy works on rigid beliefs.4
  3. Define the ends in plain terms. What would a true 0 look like? An interview where you said nothing and walked out? Most real events sit far from either end.
  4. Count the parts that went to plan. "Three runs out of four" is a different story from "I missed Thursday".
  5. Start at 20. For a project stuck at zero, pick a version you'd score 20 and do that one today.

If the thought is a prediction ("if this isn't perfect, it all falls apart"), test it against what happens instead; worry time shows how. You can also work one thought through, step by step, in the thought record, and see this pattern beside the other nine on the cognitive distortions page.

If the boxes are wearing you down

A CBT therapist works on this pattern directly. Book one if it stops you starting things week after week, or if a ruined day keeps turning into a ruined month.

Pick something from this week that felt like a failure. Draw a line from 0 to 100, mark where it sits, and write down what happened in the part between 0 and that mark.

Answer this with Joy

Questions people ask about all-or-nothing thinking

Is all-or-nothing thinking the same as black-and-white thinking?

Yes. They're two names for one pattern, and researchers call it dichotomous thinking.3

Is all-or-nothing thinking a sign of a mental health condition?

Not by itself. Everyone does it sometimes. It shows up more in perfectionism, anxiety and depression, which is where the studies above found it.3,2

Why does one mistake ruin the whole thing for me?

Because in this pattern the line between the two boxes sits at "perfect". Anything less counts as failure, so one mistake decides it.

Is it ever useful?

Sometimes a clear line helps: "I don't drive after drinking" works because it has no middle. The trouble starts when the same hard line gets drawn under a diet, a parenting evening or a piece of work.

Sources

  1. Burns DD. Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy. William Morrow, 1980.
  2. Al-Mosaiwi M, Johnstone T. In an absolute state: elevated use of absolutist words is a marker specific to anxiety, depression, and... (title shortened). Clinical Psychological Science, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617747074
  3. Egan SJ, Piek JP, Dyck MJ, Rees CS. The role of dichotomous thinking and rigidity in perfectionism. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.002
  4. Padesky CA. Schema change processes in cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.5640010502